Product work, split into finished parts
Your week goes in as noise. It comes out as work.
Calls, tickets, reviews, dashboards, threads. Prism splits that stream into insights, requirements, tickets and updates — and puts a source link on every line, so you can check it instead of trusting it.
37 calls · 210 tickets · 1.4k reviews · 9 dashboards
Discovery
Calls, tickets, reviews and sales notes come back as themes with counts and quotes, not as a summary you have to believe.
Strategy
Opportunity sizing, positioning, and the argument against your own bet — written against the evidence you actually have.
Definition
PRDs and user stories with acceptance criteria, edge cases, and a link on every claim back to the call or ticket behind it.
Delivery
Tickets drafted into Jira or Linear, scope changes tracked, release notes written from what actually shipped.
Communication
The weekly update, the exec one-pager, the answer to “why did we decide that in March” — with the decision trail attached.
The week
The job is judgement. The week is copy-paste.
11
tools a PM touches in a normal week
6–9h
a week spent synthesising feedback by hand
3 weeks
typical age of the answer to “why did we decide this”
None of that is the part of the job you were hired for. It is the tax you pay to get to it — reassembling context that already exists, in eleven places, in a format nobody can cite.
The artifact
A document that can prove itself.
Generated documents are easy. Generated documents you can defend in a room full of engineers are not.
Every requirement carries the evidence behind it — the tickets, the calls, the number and where it was measured. What has no evidence is marked as having none.
- requirement
- Bulk re-assign owners across up to 500 records in one action.
- evidence
- 17 support tickets (Q2), 4 of 6 discovery calls, NPS verbatim ×9
- not doing
- Undo history beyond one step — no signal, high cost.
- risk
- Conflicts with the permissions rewrite (LIN-4417, in flight)
- acceptance
- Partial failure reports which records failed and why.
every underlined line opens the call, ticket or dashboard it came from
Why you can leave it running
01
Every claim carries its source
A number in a document links to the dashboard it came from; a user need links to the call at the minute it was said. If it cannot cite, it says so instead of writing prose.
02
Nothing is written without you
Agents read broadly and write nowhere. Creating a ticket, updating a page, posting to Slack — each one is a diff you approve. Read scopes and write scopes are granted separately.
03
The decision trail survives
What was decided, on what evidence, and what was rejected stays attached to the artifact. Six weeks later that trail is worth more than the document.
04
It works where your work already is
Jira, Linear, Notion, Confluence, Slack, your analytics and your support desk. Prism is not another place to keep the truth — it is a lens on the places you already keep it.
Pricing
A fraction of the hours it gives back.
Solo
$39 /seat/mo
One PM, the workflows that eat the week.
- — All five workstreams
- — 3 integrations
- — Source citations
- — 30-day trail
Team
$69 /seat/mo
A product team that needs one shared trail.
- — Everything in Solo
- — Unlimited integrations
- — Shared workspace
- — Full decision history
Company
Talk
Procurement, SSO, and a security questionnaire.
- — SSO & SCIM
- — Audit log
- — Data residency
- — Named support
Prices at launch. Early-access workspaces get their first month free.
Questions
How is this different from asking an assistant to write a PRD? +
An assistant writes from what you paste. Prism reads the systems where the evidence lives, cites each claim back to its source, and pushes the result into the tool your team works in — behind a diff you approve.
Can it change things in our Jira or Notion? +
Only with your click. Read access and write access are granted separately, every write is shown as a diff first, and you can revoke either scope at any time.
What if the analysis is wrong? +
It will sometimes be. That is why the citation is not decoration: every claim has a link, so checking one is five seconds rather than a rewrite. Anything it cannot support with a source is marked as unsupported instead of being written smoothly.
Do you train on our data? +
No. Your context is used to serve your workspace and nothing else.
Is this for product managers only? +
It is built around the PM week, but founders doing the PM job and product-minded engineers get the same value — the workflows are the same, there is just no one to delegate them to.
EARLY ACCESS
Get in before the queue.
We onboard workspaces in batches, hand-held. Tell us what your week actually looks like and you go in the next one.
The two questions below are not a formality. Everyone who fills them in gets a personal reply from me within a day.